On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 09:31:57AM -0700, Jeremy via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Note that with *just* CheckSigFromStack, while you can do some very > valuable use cases, but without OP_CAT it does not enable sophisticated > covenants
Do you have concerns about sophisticated covenants, and if so, would you mind describing them? Your BIP119 CTV also mentions[1] being designed to avoid sophisticated covenants. If this is some sort of design principle, I'd like to understand the logic behind it. I'm a fan of CSFS, even mentioning it on zndtoshi's recent survey[2], but it seems artificially limited without OP_CAT. (I also stand by my answer on that survey of believing there's a deep lack of developer interest in CSFS at the moment. But, if you'd like to tilt at that windmill, I won't stop you.) -Dave [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0119.mediawiki#design-tradeoffs-and-risks [2] https://twitter.com/zndtoshi/status/1405235814712422402
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
