On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Jorge Timón wrote: > You're not even considering user resistance in your cases.
Of course I am. Again: > > My claim is that for *any* bad (evil, flawed, whatever) softfork, then > > attempting activation via bip8 is *never* superior to speedy trial, > > and in some cases is worse. > > > > If I'm missing something, you only need to work through a single example > > to demonstrate I'm wrong, which seems like it ought to be easy... But > > just saying "I disagree" and "I don't want to talk about that" isn't > > going to convince anyone. The "some cases" where bip8 with lot=true is *worse* than speedy trial is when miners correctly see that a bad fork is bad. Under *any* other circumstance, when they're used to activate a bad soft fork, speedy trial and bip8 are the same. If a resistance method works against bip8, it works against speedy trial; if it fails against speedy trial, it fails against bip8. > Sorry for the aggressive tone, but I when people ignore some of my points > repeteadly, I start to wonder if they do it on purpose. Perhaps examine the beam in your own eye. Cheers, aj _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
