On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 00:28, Andrew Chow <achow101-li...@achow101.com> wrote:
> However I don't see why this couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As > long as the tuples are all the same length, and the limit is one tuple per > key expression, then we don't get any combinatorial blowup issues. > I think it's worthwhile to generalize for any sized tuples. I don't have any existing particular use case in mind, because BIP-44, BIP-84, etc. are fine with just using <0;1>, but there might be some upcoming standards in the future that will want to introduce more sub-paths. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol "stick" Rusnak Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
