> -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay > > > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy" > > > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place. > > > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would > > > > be your perspective. > > > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or > > > that we couldn't use more of it? > > That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing > > the public process, not advocating for politeness. > > And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If you > think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process, I don't > think you should expect much success.
"BIPs are a courtesy in the first place." > If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development, please > feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or others, or > make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck, anywhere else. "RE: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay" > I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to at > least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your current > approach though. Grow up Anthony. e _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
