On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:04:05PM +0100, 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev wrote: > For further monitoring, I've set-up a mempoolfullrbf=1 node and are > logging replacement events with [0]. I filter the full-RBF replacements > and list the replaced and replacement transactions here: > https://fullrbf.mempool.observer/
I think it would be helpful to list (a) how long ago the replaced transaction was seen compared to the [full RBF event] timestamp, and (b) particularly for cases where the replaced tx was the one that was mined, how long after the [full RBF event] the block was received. Might be more hassle than it's worth, but you might consider grouping all related replacements together, so that you can see: 2b771b7949e62434bf3002ad0d38f383a29b362cf2dc31627a35a883d0de36c3 [2601.19 sat/vb] 9ce405ab14e8d68c7a43d190414e39564d90bbee21f23020f2ce45136927ce9b [2448.25 sat/vb] 1a5f239e7fc008f337605e0b405579234d0fecebaf6be966000dcfaf0bcb7beb [2295.31 sat/vb] 0500a3ca5e4998fb273be9b51a4c3a75780acf28b23409a54f4260e069441e32 [2142.37 sat/vb] 955623c789eb0a7ca0848ce964325d6b2c7d1731a686d573018f6348de6c00a1 [1989.42 sat/vb] 7838bc60405f9b38a79c94f4f045b8debaf41c0a5acfdeebc6a3904188b2bbc9 [1836.48 sat/vb] 2d5e6b84602d45c5c834e0cad4db4dd8a9142ba7eff6bacdb34a97e5cfacb418 [1683.54 sat/vb] 130851951a1d9270776852491bda3e17bb08b9309e5b76b206633f88a9341604 [1530.60 sat/vb] 3c9b2530c02a22c966fa9ef60ec0acf17bd23a8b0b4c5202589c190ee770c880 [1377,66 sat/vb] 49889043ec7dae7a4f1573c5feaca6a549d88e4fb306cf3b410155ba919da83d [1224.72 sat/vb] 861156e18ae0399cd458c6f7f7faed1a94142db45f1d879b9ae78cb11cd7e96c [1071.78 sat/vb] 961bf21f1fc35edacd4929e8db67b27a52c69a593d32aab5a024757503c0490b [ 918.84 sat/vb] 5cdb24e2ed30dfc55b23820676a9d47d158fec982e77dddadc648280f0b2c914 [ 765.90 sat/vb] 159494115af33b414df77d3965de5eb191b4a3af1c1219509f3175abc5dcd132 [ 612.95 sat/vb] dcf4c0e688ee76188e9ef829d03cc66ee7da404717b9d56d74bcd75708612271 [ 460.01 sat/vb] 1971d9122551a898bcbc5183d4ea79e273dea89aa4075d4e014f8f7dd4eb8321 [ 307.07 sat/vb] c43316d2e4bb12fbb408de01d64c4b480fd7d6875db4ebbf006fdc7579546d13 [ 154.13 sat/vb] 8bbf6a0f3dd8358c6d8a81f0811216d7980288b14daeac82ff2f672ea8e4851d [ 1.19 sat/vb] [mined in 767044] at a glance as a single block (ideally with timestamps). Arguably, that might be interesting to see in general (ie for bip-125 opt-in rbf txs as well), to see how common the "offer a low fee, and raise it over time" approach is in practice. Cheers, aj _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
