Andrew Poelstra <[email protected]> writes:
> I had a similar thought. But my feeling is that replacing the stack
> interpreter data structure is still too invasive to justify the benefit.
>
> Also, one of my favorite things about this BIP is the tiny diff.
To be fair, this diff is even smaller than the OP_CAT diff :)
Though I had to strongly resist refactoring, that interpreter code
needs a good shake! Using a class for the stack is worth doing anyway
(macros, really??).
diff --git a/src/script/interpreter.cpp b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
index dcaf28c2472..2ee2034115f 100644
--- a/src/script/interpreter.cpp
+++ b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
@@ -403,6 +403,19 @@ static bool EvalChecksig(const valtype& sig, const
valtype& pubkey, CScript::con
assert(false);
}
+// First 520 bytes is free, after than you consume an extra slot!
+static size_t effective_size(const std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >&
stack)
+{
+ size_t esize = stack.size();
+
+ for (const auto& v : stack)
+ {
+ if (v.size() > MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE)
+ esize += (v.size() - 1) / MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE;
+ }
+ return esize;
+}
+
bool EvalScript(std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >& stack, const
CScript& script, unsigned int flags, const BaseSignatureChecker& checker,
SigVersion sigversion, ScriptExecutionData& execdata, ScriptError* serror)
{
static const CScriptNum bnZero(0);
@@ -1239,7 +1252,7 @@ bool EvalScript(std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> >&
stack, const CScript&
}
// Size limits
- if (stack.size() + altstack.size() > MAX_STACK_SIZE)
+ if (effective_size(stack) + effective_size(altstack) >
MAX_STACK_SIZE)
return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_STACK_SIZE);
}
}
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
