On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Gavin Andresen <[email protected]> wrote: > Accepting this does not preclude adding more 'standard' transaction > types in the future.
I think 2 of 3 is a _far_ more useful example than (a or b), it is the prototype for a normal escrow transaction., and still only results in three address and at most two signatures like the (A and B) or C case. You can also replicate the functionality of (a or b) in a hashish and inefficient sort of way with two of three by simply using a public known key as one of the roles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
