>From talking with Patrick Strateman (phantomcircuit), he suggested this idea
>(which I will elaborate more on in the BIP):
User-agent strings are a good starting point, however they aren't easy for
parsing so we'll make a small modification to them.
We need a hierarchy from protocol, variant, gui, flavour, build
/Satoshi:314700/bitcoin-qt:0.4/
How does that sound? In BitcoinJ's case:
/BitcoinJ:0.2/AndroidBuild:0.8/
Thoughts:
- Do we need a freely defined comments field?
/BitcoinJ:0.2[iPad; U; CPU OS 3_2_1]/AndroidBuild:0.8/
/Satoshi:314700/bitcoin-qt:0.4[Ubuntu Oneiric]/
________________________________
From: Christian Decker <decker.christ...@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net>
Cc: Amir Taaki <zgen...@yahoo.com>; "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers
On BitDroid I stopped updating the protocol version at 31700 and set the string
to be both Version and Client, just like BitcoinJ :-)
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
BitCoinJ already sets the subver field to its name and version.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>RSA(R) Conference 2012
>Save $700 by Nov 18
>Register now
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
>_______________________________________________
>Bitcoin-development mailing list
>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
