Thanks Chris.
Yep, looks like an honest-ish user managed to accidentally get one tx into
one chain and another into the other.
I think I'd cautiously say that if OKPay gets their cash back, or freezes
his balance nobody is out BTC for last night, (instead just time and
effort).
I'm doing a little FUD-fighting right now, but will try and pick up a bit
more if necessary tonight after my flight lands. I think this is mostly
over the heads of a lot of our typical media contacts, though.
Peter
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Christian Decker <
decker.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a quick and dirty check if something bad actually happened. 430
> transactions that were confirmed in the alt-chain, are not confirmed
> in the true blockchain. The good news is that as far as I can tell
> most of them are low volume transactions destined for SD.
>
> 7 transactions were true double spends, or to be more precise
> transactions in which an conflicting transaction was confirmed in the
> new chain (with their respective amount):
>
> 12814b8ad57ce5654ba69eb26a52ddae1bff42093ca20cef3ad96fe7fd85d195 261 BTC
> cb36ba33b3ecd4d3177d786209670c9e6cdf95eb62be54986f0b49ca292714af 0.06 BTC
> 7192807f952b252081d0db0aa7575c4695b945820adaf7776b7189e6b3d86f96 0.01 BTC
> 355d4ea51c3b780cf0b10e8099a06a31484e0060bc140b63f3d6e5fb713ace5e 0.05 BTC
> b961bc0c663a46893afd3166a604e7e2639533522d9fec61fdb95eb665e86f5a 0.61 BTC
> 138063e4bdb76feaa511f1e7f9c681eb468ef9140c141671741c965e503b84c6 1.62 BTC
> a10bd194cdbf9aa4c12eb0b120056998a081a9b0d93d70570edff24dec831f90 0.81
>
> So the one transaction that really hurt was the one published on
> BitcoinTalk. We're not yet out of the woods as some of the 423
> transactions still have a chance of being doublespent, but looks like
> it's not that bad after all.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> P.S.: For a complete list of transactions see http://pastebin.com/wctJU3Ln
> --
> Christian Decker
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Peter Vessenes <pe...@coinlab.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Can some enterprising soul determine if there were any double-spend
> attempts?
> >>> I'm assuming no, and if that's the case, we should talk about that
> publicly.
> > [snip]
> >> I agree it would be good to confirm no one was ripped off, even though
> >> we can't say there weren't any attempts.
> >
> > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.msg1616747#msg1616747
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--
------------------------------
[image: CoinLab Logo]PETER VESSENES
CEO
*pe...@coinlab.com * / 206.486.6856 / SKYPE: vessenes
811 FIRST AVENUE / SUITE 480 / SEATTLE, WA 98104
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
