On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we should get Pieter's proposal done and implemented quickly. I > agree with Mike, it doesn't have to take a long time for the core network to > fully support this. > > Getting wallets to start generating transaction.version=3 might take years, > but that is OK.
Sure I'm all for doing what Pieter suggested— it's basically the plan we've been executing for some time already but with the version check to make it sane to complete. My reserved sounding comments were relative to the proposals to do things with nversion=1 transactions, frankly I think thats completely insane. Though while we're on the subject of reservations, I am far from confident that we've uncovered all the possible malleability routes— that list gained a new, never before discussed entry, when Pieter was writing it a couple weeks ago. We also have no proof of the absence of further algebraic malleability in DSA (though I think its somewhat unlikely, a solid proof of it has been somewhat elusive). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
