bitcoin-development  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Thy Shizzle
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups odinn
• [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: re Improving resistance to transaction origination harvesting Justus Ranvier
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] My thoughts on the viability of the Factom token Brian Deery
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] My thoughts on the viability of the Factom token Peter Todd
• [Bitcoin-development] Are Instant Confirmations safe? Dennis Sullivan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Are Instant Confirmations safe? Natanael
• [Bitcoin-development] Improving resistance to transaction origination harvesting Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Improving resistance to transaction origination harvesting Wladimir J. van der Laan
• [Bitcoin-development] My thoughts on the viability of the Factom token Peter Todd
• [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Jan Møller
  • [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Sergio Lerner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Jeremy Spilman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Sergio Lerner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Robert McKay
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Robert McKay
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Jeremy Spilman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] "network disruption as a service" and proof of local storage Sergio Lerner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups odinn
• [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment Jorge Timón
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Matias Alejo Garcia
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Matias Alejo Garcia
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Matias Alejo Garcia
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Mike Hearn
• [Bitcoin-development] Broken Threading Thy Shizzle
• [Bitcoin-development] Testnet3 Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Testnet3 Thy Shizzle
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Thomas Kerin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses devrandom
• [Bitcoin-development] bip44 GPG identities - POC demo Mem Wallet
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip44 GPG identities - POC demo Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip44 GPG identities - POC demo Natanael
• [Bitcoin-development] Useless Address attack? Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useless Address attack? Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useless Address attack? Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useless Address attack? Thy Shizzle
• [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Andrew Miller
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Ricardo Filipe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Tim Ruffing
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Stephen Reed
• [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thomas Voegtlin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Jim
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thomas Voegtlin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Jim
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Ricardo Filipe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Gary Rowe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Gary Rowe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thomas Voegtlin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Neill Miller
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Neill Miller
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged Thy Shizzle
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid, PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Andrew Lapp
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid, PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Chris Page
• [Bitcoin-development] BCF 2012 Miner vote Gregory Maxwell
• [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Oleg Andreev
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Oleg Andreev
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Oleg Andreev
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Providing Payment Request within URI Andreas Schildbach
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP proposal -- wallet extensions Mem Wallet
• [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Chris Page
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Chris Page
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Chris Page
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Jan Vornberger
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Jan Vornberger
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Jan Vornberger
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Jan Vornberger
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback Eric Voskuil
• [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) joliver
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4) Peter Todd
• [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation. 木ノ下じょな
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation. Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation. 木ノ下じょな

• Earlier messages
• Later messages