On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Friedenbach <m...@monetize.io> wrote: > Honest question: what would signed commits do to help us here anyway? > What's the problem being solved? > > Unfortunately git places signatures in the history itself, so it's not > like we could use easily use signatures to indicate acceptance after > code review, like we could if we were using monotone for example. Git > just wasn't designed for a commit-signing workflow.
Just makes it easier to sort out things like your git account (or the git site) being compromised and used to submit commits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
