On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:17 AM, xor <x...@freenetproject.org> wrote:
> So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was > allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the > list up won't help with that. The problem is not one of traffic, but of confusion of concerns, and of focus. That specific questions about Bitcoin Core are being asked, for example about watch-only functionality, in the same list where changes to the entire system (BIPs) should be decided on doesn't make sense. This has in practice caused some developers of alternative clients to not subscribe to this list, even though they *should* follow BIP discussion otherwise it makes no sense to have a process in the first place. Wladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
