I cannot believe why Gavin (who seems to have difficulty to spell my name correctly.) insists on his 20MB proposal regardless the community. BIP66 has been introduced for a long time and no one knows when the 95% goal can be met. This change to the block max size must take one year or more to be adopted. We should increase the limit and increase it now. 20MB is simply too big and too risky, sometimes we need compromise and push things forward. I agree with any solution lower than 10MB in its first two years.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Chun Wang <1240...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: >> Whilst it would be nice if miners in China can carry on forever regardless >> of their internet situation, nobody has any inherent "right" to mine if they >> can't do the job - if miners in China can't get the trivial amounts of >> bandwidth required through their firewall and end up being outcompeted then >> OK, too bad, we'll have to carry on without them. >> >> But I'm not sure why it should be a big deal. They can always run a node on >> a server in Taiwan and connect the hardware to it via a VPN or so. > > Ignorant. You seem do not understand the current situation. We > suffered from orphans a lot when we started in 2013. It is now your > turn. If Western miners do not find a China-based VPN into China, or > if Western pools do not manage to improve their connectivity to China, > or run a node in China, it would be them to have higher orphans, not > us. Because we have 50%+. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Chun Wang <1240...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: >> Whilst it would be nice if miners in China can carry on forever regardless >> of their internet situation, nobody has any inherent "right" to mine if they >> can't do the job - if miners in China can't get the trivial amounts of >> bandwidth required through their firewall and end up being outcompeted then >> OK, too bad, we'll have to carry on without them. >> >> But I'm not sure why it should be a big deal. They can always run a node on >> a server in Taiwan and connect the hardware to it via a VPN or so. > > Ignorant. You seem do not understand the current situation. We > suffered from orphans a lot when we started in 2013. It is now your > turn. If Western miners do not find a China-based VPN into China, or > if Western pools do not manage to improve their connectivity to China, > or run a node in China, it would be them to have higher orphans, not > us. Because we have 50%+. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development