The current max block size of 1000000 bytes is not power of two anyway. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitc...@olivere.de> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: >> What do other people think? Would starting at a max of 8 or 4 get >> consensus? Scaling up a little less than Nielsen's Law of Internet >> Bandwidth predicts for the next 20 years? (I think predictability is >> REALLY important). >> >> I chose 20 because all of my testing shows it to be safe, and all of my >> back-of-the-envelope calculations indicate the costs are reasonable. >> >> If consensus is "8 because more than order-of-magnitude increases are >> scary" -- ok. > > It would feel better for me if you would keep the power of two: > > 2^0 = 1MB > 2^1 = 2MB > 2^2 = 4MB > 2^3 = 8MB > . > . > . > > But that's only personal. Maybe other people feeling the same. > > - oliver > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
