I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gapplet...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could > condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if > the page gets approval. > On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <m...@henricson.se> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >> drives me nuts. >> >> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >> >> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >> >> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >> >> Mats >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
