Just pushed the template for Arguments 3, 4, 6, and a full Argument 2. Argument 5 should be pro, but is currently not defined. Argument 6 may be merged with Argument 4 if you think that's necessary.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:41 AM, gabe appleton <gapplet...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing to apologize for. And yes, that's the correct one. > On Jun 6, 2015 2:39 AM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK... sorry for my confusion. >> >> https://github.com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate >> >> it is. >> >> p. >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, gabe appleton <gapplet...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Please use the one it's originally forked from that Ethan made. I don't >>> want to be the one who sorts through what's valid and what isn't, as I >>> don't have as low-level an understanding as I'd like. I don't feel >>> qualified. >>> On Jun 6, 2015 2:34 AM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Gabe. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate >>>> >>>> github's reachable via vpn. >>>> >>>> p. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <gapplet...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the >>>>> exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain. >>>>> >>>>> I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on >>>>> this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get >>>>> some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase. >>>>> On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gabe, >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you ever get an answer to this? >>>>>> >>>>>> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on >>>>>> this and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I >>>>>> understand >>>>>> the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb >>>>>> blocks... but hey that's just me. >>>>>> >>>>>> p. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gapplet...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll >>>>>>> happily get a framework started. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails >>>>>>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the >>>>>>>> various >>>>>>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton < >>>>>>>> gapplet...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we >>>>>>>>> could condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to >>>>>>>>> assist if the page gets approval. >>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <m...@henricson.se> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >>>>>>>>>> drives me nuts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >>>>>>>>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >>>>>>>>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >>>>>>>>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >>>>>>>>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mats >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
