Hi Weikeng, CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet. https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance https://faucet.mutinynet.com/
[signet] signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae addnode=45.79.52.207:38333 dnsseed=0 signetblocktime=30 BR, moonsettler Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be > added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot > of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS > isn't. > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to > start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by > replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential > on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on > CTV + CSFS to develop further. > > Thanks, > Weikeng > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/YTXcnvj3CZoGdDNe3guQByg4YvYt2SXX8O-PmFe281ihDmVzAgbEpxVje8hO-vXqdaQNOw0pTB7w8G0hgkqZzUbCKbQ83RQx1Zm857ctfpg%3D%40protonmail.com.
