On 2025-03-16 08:25, Martin Habovštiak wrote:
It is possible to implement fully secure recovery if we forbid
spending of hashed keys unless done through the following scheme:
Hi Martin,
How does this differ from Tim Ruffing's version[1] of Guy Fawkes
signatures?[2][3]
Thanks, -Dave
[1]
https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/[email protected]/
(but see also the whole thread and the links in it)
[2] https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/archive/rja14/Papers/fawkes.pdf
[3] Amusing exploration of a blockchain cryptocurrency without
signatures by Joseph Bonneau and Andrew Miller:
https://jbonneau.com/doc/BM14-SPW-fawkescoin.pdf (never saw it before,
but it came up in my search results for a Guy Fawkes signatures
reference).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin
Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/bb54cf2c858843e8a4a9029ac683b3ed%40dtrt.org.
