bitcoindev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.2 Released 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Descriptors using H as a hardened indicator 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Chris Stewart
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
• [bitcoindev] Proposal: Self-Verifiable Transaction Broadcast Log for Enhanced User Transparency wang wang
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal: Self-Verifiable Transaction Broadcast Log for Enhanced User Transparency Murch
• [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" David A. Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
  • [bitcoindev] Re: The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Dave Scotese
  • The Case for Decentralizing Bitcoin Core Development [was Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core] Christopher Allen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core TheCharlatan
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
• [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Paul Sztorc
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter David A. Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Paul Sztorc
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Saint Wenhao
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Melvin Carvalho
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter gmaxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Sanket Kanjalkar
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Sanket Kanjalkar
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Owen Kemeys
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Steven Roose
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter fiatjaf
• [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures Jonas Nick
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures Jonas Nick
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] V3/TRUC miner adoption Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] V3/TRUC miner adoption Peter Todd
• [bitcoindev] Allowing Duplicate Keys in BIP 390 musig() Expressions 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Allowing Duplicate Keys in BIP 390 musig() Expressions Nagaev Boris
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Allowing Duplicate Keys in BIP 390 musig() Expressions 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Nagaev Boris
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Tim Ruffing
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Nagaev Boris
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) Leo Wandersleb
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Pre-emptive commit/reveal for quantum-safe migration (poison-pill) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Tadge Dryja
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Sergio Demian Lerner
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Nagaev Boris
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Jonathan Voss
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Q C
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Jonathan Voss
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork Nagaev Boris
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Post-Quantum commit / reveal Fawkescoin variant as a soft fork waxwing/ AdamISZ
• [bitcoindev] Sybil resistance in different coinjoin implementations /dev /fd0
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Sybil resistance in different coinjoin implementations waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Sybil resistance in different coinjoin implementations /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Sybil resistance in different coinjoin implementations waxwing/ AdamISZ
• [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) John Carvalho
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship Resistant Transaction Relay - Taking out the garbage(man) Rijndael
• [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint Aviv Bar-el
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Draft BIP: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint 'hodlinator' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Draft BIP: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint 'hodlinator' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint Murch
• [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Jonathan Voss
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Jonathan Voss
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Jonathan Voss
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Dave Scotese
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal to solve the spam war: configurable data blob relay policy Peter Todd
• [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation Eric Kvam
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation Kyle Honeycutt
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation Eric
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation Eric Kvam
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation pithosian
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation nerdyrugbyguy
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation pithosian
  • RE: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation eric
  • Re: [bitcoindev] BIP39 Extension for Manual Seed Phrase Creation 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] jpeg resistance of various post-quantum signature schemes 'Bas Westerbaan' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: jpeg resistance of various post-quantum signature schemes Hunter Beast
  • [bitcoindev] Re: jpeg resistance of various post-quantum signature schemes 'Bas Westerbaan' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: jpeg resistance of various post-quantum signature schemes Q C
  • [bitcoindev] Re: jpeg resistance of various post-quantum signature schemes Q C
• [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Chris Stewart
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Chris Stewart
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Christian Decker
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Chris Stewart
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Proposal] 64-bit arithmetic in Script Christian Decker
• [bitcoindev] Graftleaf: Program Composition and Generic Delegation Josh Doman
• [bitcoindev] ColliderVM protocol for computation and L2 bridges 'Victor Kolobov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate danger Anthony Towns

• Earlier messages
• Later messages