It should be needless to say, but this idea is utter insanity.
Disappointing to see positive responses, and not one sensible reply
calling it out yet. The bugs should be fixed, not the abuse embraced. If
attackers continue to bypass filters, we can go back to a full whitelist
approach. We're now 2+ years into this wave of attacks, and the damage
it has already done should be more than enough to prove the hands-off
attitude is not viable. Am I the only one left on this list who actually
cares about Bitcoin's survival?
On 4/17/25 14:52, 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
wrote:
Hi,
Standardness rules exist for 3 mains reasons: mitigate DoS vectors,
provide upgrade hooks, or as a nudge to deter some usages.
Bitcoin Core will by default only relay and mine transactions with at
most a single OP_RETURN output, with a scriptPubKey no larger than 83
bytes. This standardness rule falls into the third category: it aims
to mildly deter data storage while still allowing a less harmful
alternative than using non-provably-unspendable outputs.
Developers are now designing constructions that work around these
limitations. An example is Clementine, the recently-announced Citrea
bridge, which uses unspendable Taproot outputs to store data in its
"WatchtowerChallenge" transaction due to the standardness restrictions
on the size of OP_RETURNs[^0]. Meanwhile, we have witnessed in recent
years that the nudge is ineffective to deter storing data onchain.
Since the restrictions on the usage of OP_RETURN outputs encourage
harmful practices while being ineffective in deterring unwanted usage,
i propose to drop them. I suggest to start by lifting the restriction
on the size of the scriptPubKey for OP_RETURN outputs, as a first
minimal step to stop encouraging harmful behaviour, and to then
proceed to lift the restriction on the number of OP_RETURN outputs per
transactions.
Antoine Poinsot
[^0]: See section 6.1 of their whitepaper here
https://citrea.xyz/clementine_whitepaper.pdf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/rhfyCHr4RfaEalbfGejVdolYCVWIyf84PT2062DQbs5-eU8BPYty5sGyvI3hKeRZQtVC7rn_ugjUWFnWCymz9e9Chbn7FjWJePllFhZRKYk%3D%40protonmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/rhfyCHr4RfaEalbfGejVdolYCVWIyf84PT2062DQbs5-eU8BPYty5sGyvI3hKeRZQtVC7rn_ugjUWFnWCymz9e9Chbn7FjWJePllFhZRKYk%3D%40protonmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin
Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/03be4934-f0ff-4b58-880d-861d63a4f970%40dashjr.org.