so 13. 12. 2025 v 0:49 odesílatel Greg Maxwell <[email protected]> napsal:

> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 9:26 PM Jonathan Voss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Since the Bitcoin Stamps outputs are already unspendable, it makes
>> perfect sense to mark and drop them from the UTXO set.
>
>
> There is no consensus change involved in not storing a provably
> unspendable output, it's just an implementation detail with no
> interoperability implications and doesn't need a BIP.  Bitcoin core has
> long done so for several types of unspendable outputs, e.g. outputs over
> 10kb and ones starting with OP_RETURN.
>

Alternative to confiscation: what if miners simply required 100+ sats/vbyte
to include transactions spending inscription UTXOs?


>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAAS2fgTjF_e5vLEzp672_jmF82jDUre0wcZKHB5my8kTdFOGgw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAAS2fgTjF_e5vLEzp672_jmF82jDUre0wcZKHB5my8kTdFOGgw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAKaEYh%2B9HFKVDXdkkgsBeW0aq7mWVvpzZ9iy%3DX8%2B%3D6t%2BiCswuA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to