Hi everyone,
the pull request implementing the feedback from this thread was merged
today. The PR adopted many of the suggestions provided here. I believe
that the other issues and concerns have been addressed by me and others
in this thread. I would like to highlight especially that the recently
added guidance regarding AI/LLM use was reverted, a Changelog was added
to BIP 3, and the process for number assignment was slightly clarified.
In total, the PR had twelve commits titled as follow:
3d07d12 Revert "BIP3: add guidance on originality, quality, LLMs"
56ac1c2 bip3: Broaden reference implementation formats
6f62034 bip3: Clarify editor assignment of BIP numbers
25810a0 bip3: Avoid implying BIP editors must reply to every ML post
e44d11e bip3: Clarify that draft needs to be discussed on ML
86d9737 bip-0003: Move Type header responsibility to the author(s)
5fd4162 bip-0003: Changes from BIP 2: Make it match actual spec
f29514f bip3: Fix capitalization and drop footnote
f389e9b bip3: Avoid onus
41fe83f bip3: Add and backfill Changelog section
a9308f3 bip3: Require technical soundness
897fa1b bip3: Do not waste community’s time
You can find the changes in detail in the PR:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2051
I will now be working on bringing the activation PR back up-to-date (see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1820), as I turn the conversation
back over to you, to assess whether all concerns have been addressed
satisfactorily and whether BIP 3 has rough consensus for activating.
Thanks,
Murch
On 2025-12-09 16:56, Murch wrote:
Hey all,
Thank you for your ardent review and discussion. I have read and
processed all emails in this thread. In conclusion, I have opened a pull
request that:
- reverts the recently added guidance regarding AI/LLM use
- adds a Changelog
- adopts some of the suggestions from Luke’s review as indicated by my
replies here and on his pull request in the BIPs Repository (#2037)
Should anyone want to take another stab at providing guidance regarding
use of AI/LLM, I would like to suggest that such a proposal be tackled
after activation of BIP 3.
I am looking forward to your review, and hope that you find that between
my responses here and the changes proposed in the pull request all
comments have been addressed adequately.
Please find the pull request here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/
pull/2051
Best,
Murch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin
Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/fa4610d6-ba6b-485c-8fa0-710d45a684a4%40murch.one.
