Dear colleagues,

In early November, I asked whether there was support for adopting BIP 3 as the guideline for the BIPs Process.

In response, about a dozen respondents stated support for activating BIP 3. Some respondents raised concerns that resulted in changes to the BIP or otherwise were addressed here on the mailing list. The adopted changes were summarized here on the mailing list (see https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/j4_toD-ofEc/m/esV-XScYAAAJ). A few respondents seemed to imply general support, but requested reversal of the recently introduced LLM-policy, which has since been implemented. As there was no further follow-up to raised concerns in over three weeks, I posit that the concerns have been addressed satisfactorily.

In detail, Ava Chow, David Gumberg, Jon Atack, Jonas Nick, Gloria Zhao, Michael Ford, Ruben Somsen, Greg Sanders, and Antoine Poinsot explicitly stated support for activating BIP 3 before the amendment. Pieter Wuille supported activation conditional on the reversal of the LLM-guidance. Concerns by David Harding, Luke Dashjr, and Melvin Carvalho have been addressed. The amended proposal has been explicitly endorsed (again) by AJ Towns, Tim Ruffing, and Pol Espinasa after the December 15th update.

It is my perception that among those that commented, support for activation significantly outweighed rejection, and that all concerns have been addressed. As Melvin Carvalho pointed out, that I, as the Author of the proposal, should not be the one to assess whether BIP 3 has rough consensus. I therefore request that others, especially participants in the BIPs process, comment on whether they perceive there to be rough consensus for activating BIP 3.

Thanks,
Murch

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin 
Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/1d76a085-deff-4df2-8a82-f8bd984fac27%40murch.one.

Reply via email to