bitcoindev  

Messages by Thread

• • [bitcoindev] Re: Who uses or wants to use PSBTv2 (BIP370) Andrew Toth
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.1 Released 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Summary: Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks developer
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks Owen Kemeys
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks Michael Cassano
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks developer
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Mandatory Inclusion of Old Transactions in Blocks Jameson Lopp
• [bitcoindev] CTV++ OP_TEMPLATEHASH & OP_INPUTAMOUNTS 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Censorship and Privacy in Chaumian ecash implementations /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship and Privacy in Chaumian ecash implementations 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Censorship and Privacy in Chaumian ecash implementations /dev /fd0
• [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Javier Mateos
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Reiterating centralized coinjoin (Wasabi & Samourai) deanonymization attacks Yuval Kogman
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.1 Release Candidate 2 Available 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• Re: [bitcoindev] BIP Draft: "ChillDKG: Distributed Key Generation for FROST" Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoindev] Double Exponential Hash Rate Growth and Difficulty Adjustment Anders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Double Exponential Hash Rate Growth and Difficulty Adjustment Michael Cassano
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Double Exponential Hash Rate Growth and Difficulty Adjustment Anders
• [bitcoindev] TRUC and P2A for CTV fee management 'stutxo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: TRUC and P2A for CTV fee management /dev /fd0
  • [bitcoindev] Re: TRUC and P2A for CTV fee management 'stutxo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Weikeng Chen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Tadge Dryja
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path David A. Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path Ian Quantum
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Trivial QC signatures with clean upgrade path David A. Harding
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Redefinition of the Bitcoin Unit to the Base Denomination Bitcoin Error Log
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Redefinition of the Bitcoin Unit to the Base Denomination George Burke
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Redefinition of the Bitcoin Unit to the Base Denomination Michael Cassano
• [bitcoindev] Re: Proposal for Quantum-Resistant Cryptography in Bitcoin - BIP Submission Ian Quantum
• Re: [bitcoindev] Time for an update to BIP2? Murch
• [bitcoindev] Difficulty in emulating "weaker" OP_SUCCESS and why it should be a real opcode Weikeng Chen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Difficulty in emulating "weaker" OP_SUCCESS and why it should be a real opcode Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Difficulty in emulating "weaker" OP_SUCCESS and why it should be a real opcode Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Difficulty in emulating "weaker" OP_SUCCESS and why it should be a real opcode Weikeng Chen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Difficulty in emulating "weaker" OP_SUCCESS and why it should be a real opcode Brandon Black
• [bitcoindev] Full Disclosure: "Transaction-Relay Throughput Overflow Attacks against Off-Chain Protocols" Antoine Riard
• Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Great Consensus Cleanup Revival Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.1 Release Candidate 1 Available 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Jonas Nick
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Yuval Kogman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki Brandon Black
• [bitcoindev] Un-FE’d Covenants: Char-ting a new path to Emulated Covenants via BitVM Integrity Checks jeremy
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Un-FE’d Covenants: Char-ting a new path to Emulated Covenants via BitVM Integrity Checks Erik Aronesty
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Un-FE’d Covenants: Char-ting a new path to Emulated Covenants via BitVM Integrity Checks jeremy
• [bitcoindev] Slashing covenants Ethan Heilman
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Slashing covenants Hunter Beast
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Slashing covenants Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] Prevent future duplicate coinbase transactions as part of Consensus Cleanup 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core on ARM (Windows) Ali Sherief
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Bitcoin Core on ARM (Windows) Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Multi-byte opcodes Weikeng Chen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Multi-byte opcodes Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Multi-byte opcodes Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Multi-byte opcodes 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Multi-byte opcodes Brandon Black
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Multi-byte opcodes Garlo Nicon
• Re: [bitcoindev] Signing a Bitcoin Transaction with Lamport Signatures (no changes needed) Xiaohui Liu
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Signing a Bitcoin Transaction with Lamport Signatures (no changes needed) Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Signing a Bitcoin Transaction with Lamport Signatures (no changes needed) Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] OP_PAIRCOMMIT 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Broken links to the previous mailing list archive Bryan Bishop
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Broken links to the previous mailing list archive Weikeng Chen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Broken links to the previous mailing list archive Andrew Poelstra
• Re: [bitcoindev] BIP 21 Updates Matt Corallo
• [bitcoindev] ColliderScript: Covenants in Bitcoin via 160-bit hash collisions Ethan Heilman
  • [bitcoindev] Re: ColliderScript: Covenants in Bitcoin via 160-bit hash collisions Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: ColliderScript: Covenants in Bitcoin via 160-bit hash collisions Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: ColliderScript: Covenants in Bitcoin via 160-bit hash collisions Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: ColliderScript: Covenants in Bitcoin via 160-bit hash collisions Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] Public disclosure of one vulnerability affecting Bitcoin Core <26.0 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List

• Later messages