This has been a most entertaining and in the end quite a constructive feed. Just my opinion.
A couple of years ago I went to a conference in Florida for vici and met a couple of fellas from Brazil, they had been wrestling with fraud, hacked systems etc for call center clients in Brazil just ONE incident came to $50,000.00. (some number you called to pre pay cell phones and huge call centers 2k seats plus so blend right in to the bill i guess). Sometimes its hard to find that right balance..... On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Henry Coleman <henry.cole...@voip-pbx.ca>wrote: > I think Stephan has got it about right, however he may want to look a > product offering for new Asterisk (TAUG) members who basically want to > experiment with VoIP lines. > Although $50 is not a lot of money a six month introductory rate ($25) for > new customers may bring in some new clients that can be developed as they > grow. > As for myself I have found Unlimitel to have constantly improved their QOS > over the years and quite frankly would not consider any other carrier > unless > I had to. I would also like to mention a problem I had a couple of months > ago when one of my client's servers got hacked ( It was my fault for > leaving > the door open). The hacker > made about 12 calls to North Korea early one morning. Within an hour, > someone from Unlimitel called me to ask if this was "real", at which time I > said "NO" and cut the calls and fix the > security hole. Although I had to pay for these calls ($200) if I had been > on > a post payed business model I could have racked up thousands of dollars of > calls without knowing. > I am not a large user of VoIP services but I have to have the peace of mind > that comes with knowing that my clients can be sure that their lines are > the > highest quality and are not going to disconnected > because the VoIP supplier goes out of business. It is in everyone's > interest > to have a strong a viable carrier. > PS I shall be giving Unlimitel a back-up credit card (just in case) > > H > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Kovalenko, Alex <a...@kovasys.com> wrote: > > > Whoa. I did not mean to open a can of worms. > > > > I have resolved a problem by providing Unlimitel with my girlfriend's > > credit card # to authorize a payment for $12, after getting my > > girlfriend in the middle of the day over to McGill to scan her credit > > card form and signature (she was not too happy :) ) and will provide > > them with new CCs when they come in from a bank (hopefully this > > morning). Thank you. > > > > What I wanted to say was that I was a bit surprised that they treat > > you like a criminal threating to cut off your service within hours > > (for $12 nevertheless) even when you have steady minutes / payments > > for the last several years. I understand that it could become a > > problem, but maybe with new accounts, and not long term existing > > clients. As for www.VoIPGizmos.ca - we have clients who pay after and > > have about $8,000 in outstanding payments - we only give this benefit > > of the doubt to customers who have spent several thousand with us in a > > past and not for new ones. As Mike Lipkin would say, Trust your fellow > > man. > > > > BUT.... Unlimitel VoIP quality and support is amazing and highly > > recommended and the only of its kind in Canada. Just make sure no one > > steals your credit cards or you are in trouble, Buster. :) > > > > -- > > Alex Kovalenko, http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kovasys > > Director of Operations @ Kovasys IT Recruitment > > IT Recruitment and Headhunting | Chasseur de Tête en TI > > 888.568.2747 x701 | www.ITHeadhunters.ca > > > > Read about us in the News: > > http://bit.ly/KovasysNews > > > > Join our IT Jobs Association Linkedin group: > > http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2464449 > > > > Follow us on Twitter: > > http://www.twitter.com/kovasys > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Mark Palser <mpal...@acpa.ca> wrote: > > > Reza, I understand where you're coming from but for me this is like > when > > > somebody asks for a reference and you can't give it because the person > > > was useless. People come and ask TAUG who they would recommend, so if > > > you've had a good experience with a company you put their name forth, > if > > > that happens to be any company but Unlimitel we can all read between > the > > > lines . To drag a person through the mud is bad enough but one who is a > > > regular reader/contributor is just bad form in my opinion, this should > > > have been discussed off board. I know I'm a lurker and read more than I > > > post, just my 2 cents. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Reza - Asterisk Consultant [mailto:aster...@neoenova.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:43 AM > > > To: asterisk biz > > > Subject: Re: [biz] Unlimitel > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mark (and readers): > > > > > > As a TAUG promoter, TAUG evangelist, and someone who has contributed > for > > > the benefit of TAUG and bringing/inviting over 100+ of my clients and > > > students to TAUG from different avenues of expertise, including but not > > > limited to promoting TAUG in major career fairs and providing Asterisk > > > training (while representing TAUG) at international venues world wide > > > over the past several years -- without prejudice, I have to interject > > > here and say that this **is** also the place to bring forth concerns > > > against carriers or service providers (not just recommendations) - for > > > the benefit of everyone else, no matter how bitter it may sound. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the thread is ugly and though it may sound like a pissing contest > > > (as per your words) - it needs to be heard by those who are considering > > > VoIP services or have voip services from Unlimitel. > > > > > > I'm not going to speak for Keith, Alex, Bruce or Chuck -- though they > > > are my friends, business associates and also competitors for the past > > > several years. I am going to speak for myself about my experience > with > > > Unlimitel and readers may interpret this as they see fit. No doubt, > > > Alex isn't happy, Keith, Bruce and Chuck are being diplomatic, but I'm > > > going to be very blunt. > > > > > > > > > > > > On October 1st, 2009, 10:51 AM - I wrote to Stephan; " I got > > > my own PRI's and have my own capacity now, and marketing to Toronto > > > based SMB & SOHO. I need to port out 2 of my numbers. One is my > home > > > number and the other is my business number. 416-xxx-xxxx and > > > 416-xxx-xxxx. Nothing personal - just that I need more control over > > > these numbers. The 3rd number I have, I want to keep with you. > Please > > > advise which company holds the PRI for my number and the main BTN - in > > > order to ensure my port out request goes smoothly. " > > > > > > Same day at 11:11 AM, I got a reply from him, " You will need > > > to port out all your number as we will now close your account. In your > > > port request just specify Bell as the carrier and Unlimitel as the > > > reseller. Use your billing information you have with Unlimitel in your > > > request. Bell will check your account status with our database to > accept > > > or reject the LNP request. This is your 30 days notice that we will be > > > closing your account on November 1st 2009 and we will refund any > balance > > > from your prepaid account on that date. I checked your usage for the > > > last 2 months and you used less than $6 in minutes. So we can't keep > > > your account with us with such low revenues. " > > > > > > I have referred customers to Unlimitel over the past several years and > > > had them purchase their own accounts with their own credit card for > > > termination and origination. For each of these referrals, I had been > > > offering Asterisk hosting solutions. Each of them are light users with > > > an average of 200-300 minutes per month. So I knew Unlimitel's > excuse > > > to terminate me as a client was... well... (fill in the blanks). I > > > would caution you twice before you do business with Unlimitel. Was I > > > upset and am I upset at Unlimitel? Absolutely! Anyone would be. > > > > > > > > > > > > I assure you, and I promise you - I am **not** the only person > Unlimitel > > > has fired as a client. This entire SNAFU could have easily been > > > avoided by Unlimitel if they exercised a little more customer friendly > > > professional approach with elegant courtesy, reasonable time line, > > > and/or parting away under good terms. > > > > > > > > > > > > As per your quote, " besides if you have nothing good to say, why say > > > it, this is supposed to be a community helping each other " -- You say > > > it, so your fellow community members are cautioned about the true > nature > > > of certain business owners and you say it, because you believe that is > > > the right thing to do. > > > > > > > > > > > > I commend Alex and Keith for taking the stand in addressing their > > > concerns openly and boldly. > > > > > > > > > With no regrets, > > > Reza. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Mark Palser <mpal...@acpa.ca> wrote: > > > > > > Take this off board, really isn't the proper venue, besides if you have > > > nothing good to say, why say it, this is supposed to be a community > > > helping each other, not a place to have a pissing match. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Confidentiality Note > > > > > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent > > responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are > > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > communication in error, please notify us immediately. Thank you. > > > > > > Avis sur la confidentialite > > > > > > Ce courriel est transmis au destinataire pour ses propres fins. Il > > pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou soumis au secret > > professionnel selon les lois applicables. Si vous n'etes pas le veritable > > destinataire, ou son/sa mandataire, il est strictement interdit de > diffuser > > ce courriel, les renseignements qu'il contient ou les documents qui lui > sont > > joints. Si vous avez recu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser > > l'expediteur immediatement et veuillez le supprimer sans le lire, > > l'imprimer, le sauvegarder ou le diffuser. Merci de votre aimable > > collaboration. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: biz-unsubscr...@taug.ca > > For additional commands, e-mail: biz-h...@taug.ca > > > > > > > -- > Henry Coleman > -- The information contained in e-mail transmissions and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an e-mail in error, please notify the system manager and note that any review, retransmission, copying, distribution or other use of the e-mail is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and please delete the material from any computer that may have it and contact the original sender.
