> From: scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: website - _basic_ design available
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:43:10 -0500
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2002 07:56, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > I'm no HTML guru, but is there a way that we can combine these two ideas
> > to gain the best of both of these?
> >
> > Jamin W. Collins
>
> Well, there's no way that i know to get a side nav bar other than tables
> or "fancy" DHTML stuff or layers and positioning (and the latter two
> would almost definately not work in text-only browsers)
>
> Is there something wrong with the use of tables on the
> http://furt.com/blackbox/ site? Tables are properly handled in 'links',
> which i used as my test for a text-only compatible browser, so i figured
> that most text-only browsers had learned how to cope with rudimentary
> table handling.
There's nothing wrong with tables or side menus. But in a 80x24
xterm, the other site uses the space more efficiently IMO.
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
12:38PM up 8 days, 23:16, 17 users, load averages: 0.09, 0.08, 0.03
