> The compiler doesn't know which "shape" you are referring to. The struct > definition is in the style of C programming. In C++ when you define a > struct, the name of the struct is automatically type qualified. So you now > have a private type called "shape". >
Actually that's not really correct. It just doesn't know that you want it to use the private data member "shape" not the private type "shape". > Because the struct itself is private, I would rename the type-qualified > name to something else. It doesn't matter what. _shape, m_shape, p_shape, > prv_shape, whatever. I think that will fix the problems. > I took an another look, and you will most likely have to do the same on the cursor struct. That's how I understand the problem anyways, A
