You're absolutely right, Derek. I credit Sean and Brad with all that they do (and have done).
I use blackbox because it is lean and fast, and when a new version comes out, it is leaner and faster. Most of the features/configurations I could really care less about, but I'll say this: I'd rather adapt my usage or learn a new method than have the wm get slower. I'm definitely a fan of configurability, but for something like a window manager which is usually so ever-present, we should always be mindful of the impact of said configurations (read: feature creep, code bloat). Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Thu, Jun06,02 11:38, Chris Grossmann wrote: > > Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > Yeah... further to this, to whom to we cater? The users, or the power users? > > > The featureists, or the minimalists? > > > > The authors. :) > > > > Maybe... but I don't think this is the case. > > Right now authoring blackbox is closed (true, we can produce patches, and we > have complete access to CVS, but if an addition is made by someone outside > of The Blackbox Authors group, and something is changed in BB that breaks > that patch, then the patch author has to re-write it). This may end up being > the case for all time... however I hold hope that the bblib separation will > give patchers great freedoms over the control of blackbox. > > It's very obvious that the authors are working with the users... of course, > they are only taking suggestions, and implement the ones that they feel suit > them, the project, or the users best. This governing body is not unlike the > one used for Kernel devel (Linus pretty much has the last say for what goes > in and what comes out) and I can live with it. :) > > DC > > -- > Derek Cunningham > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Human beings act intelligently only after they have > exhausted the alternatives" -- Abba Eban > > Registered Linux User Number 195825 > -- Chris Grossmann NEW EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW WEB: http://www.grossmann.us YIM - chris_grossmann_rtp