I've followed Eugenia's writing for some time. *She* was often considered a zealot when her husband was working for Be... but I would also consider her a "fighter of the good fight". So I am curious; what would be the "proper" way to deal with the Microsoft "issue"?
I've reffered to them as Micro$oft for as long as I can remember (6 years?). Using "M$" on the webpage may not be proffessional, but exactly who are you trying to impress? Are you trying to convey a rebellious attitude toward the big-brotherish business model and the bloated, cartoonish GUI? Or are you trying to pander to those who need to appreciate your proffessionalism? I really wish I knew exactly where Eugenia was going with this... I'de like to have some ellaboration of her philosophy on this one; something that makes her sound less...broken. TimH On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:25:20 -0400 Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Somebody sent this to me; thought you guys might find it interesting. > > -- > A common mistake that people make when trying to design something > completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete > fools. >
