Sounds like the best plan to me.

Howard

On Nov 15, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Patrick wrote:

> Good idea, I like it.
> 'Permanent', reliable hosting, structure to build from, a site
> everyone knows about.
> 
> It wouldnnt take too long at all to get everything set up 'in one
> place'.
> 
> I'll give Alcor an email if no one comes up with a better idea / if
> we're all agreed.
> 
> On Nov 15, 6:57 pm, "Jon Stovell (a.k.a. Sesquipedalian)"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Of course, instead of creating an entirely new site, we could ask
>> Alcor if some trusted members can have access to blacktree.com itself,
>> or at least the Quicksilver section of it. Integrating the GitHub
>> content, such as the wiki, etc., could then be done relatively easily
>> (even if only by plopping in some iframes, so that the GitHub content
>> itself can run independently.) After all, blacktree.com has been QS's
>> home since its inception. It'd be best to stay there as much as
>> possible.

Reply via email to