Another agree to use blacktree if alcor is willing to do this...
On Nov 15, 7:57 pm, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea, I like it. > 'Permanent', reliable hosting, structure to build from, a site > everyone knows about. > > It wouldnnt take too long at all to get everything set up 'in one > place'. > > I'll give Alcor an email if no one comes up with a better idea / if > we're all agreed. > > On Nov 15, 6:57 pm, "Jon Stovell (a.k.a. Sesquipedalian)" > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of course, instead of creating an entirely new site, we could ask > > Alcor if some trusted members can have access to blacktree.com itself, > > or at least the Quicksilver section of it. Integrating the GitHub > > content, such as the wiki, etc., could then be done relatively easily > > (even if only by plopping in some iframes, so that the GitHub content > > itself can run independently.) After all, blacktree.com has been QS's > > home since its inception. It'd be best to stay there as much as > > possible.
