On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 14:10 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > For the particulars, the srp
I missed the fact you mentioned the SRP plugin. To the best of my knowledge that is a supported and non-experimental plugin, so we should be fixing that one. > and passdss fixes I came up with on my > own trying to build all the plugins and inserting ssl headers until it > built. However, the header insertion for ntlm is already in the CVS. > And people might like to have ntlm since you can't control if some > misguided soul is trying to access your mail server with Outlook. But > I don't mind if it all goes on the Wiki. Not sure what to think about the "unsupported" and "experimental" stuff. I'm not sure BLFS wants to get involved in fixing something like that. However, if there is a CVS fix for it, then it can't hurt to put it in with the SRP patch. That only leaves the passdss plugin, and I suppose we'll all just lend a blind eye if it got put in with the other two fixes. :-) -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 16:17:06 up 15 days, 22:51, 4 users, load average: 0.08, 0.12, 0.09 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
