Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> 
>> There is an entity in general.ent for the LFS Book that is based on the
>> BLFS book (mirror) the reader might be using. Let's use that instead of
>> hard-coding www.linuxfromscratch.org.
>>
> Randy,
> Are you refering too lfs-root? Just curious why we are using a relative
> path rather than a http path that has been commented out. The link only
> works when the document is read online. e.g. The link under Shadow in
> the BLFS-6.3.pdf document doesn't work.

Yeah, sort of a catch-22. PDF readers will just have to figure
it out. Keep in mind that as soon as we release BLFS-6.5, then
the hard-coded .../view/stable/... will be wrong in *all* the
books. That is why I used a relative path.

I don't think many people even use the PDF version. Every time
Gerard sees one, he deletes it anyway. He thinks there is a
bandwidth issue so he compresses it.

We're probably better off using the relative path.

Thanks,
Randy

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to