Em 07-12-2015 05:50, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > On 06/12/2015 22:23, [email protected] wrote: >> Author: fernando >> Date: Sun Dec 6 13:23:03 2015 >> New Revision: 16712 >> [...] >> Modified: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc.xml >> ============================================================================== >> >> --- trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc.xml Sun Dec 6 11:36:17 2015 >> (r16711) >> +++ trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc.xml Sun Dec 6 13:23:03 2015 >> (r16712) >> @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ >> <!ENTITY gcc-download-http >> "http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/gcc/gcc-&gcc-version;/gcc-&gcc-version;.tar.bz2";> >> >> <!ENTITY gcc-download-ftp >> "ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-&gcc-version;/gcc-&gcc-version;.tar.bz2";> >> - <!ENTITY gcc-md5sum "a51bcfeb3da7dd4c623e27207ed43467"> >> - <!ENTITY gcc-size "91 MB"> >> - <!ENTITY gcc-buildsize "5.9 GB"> >> - <!ENTITY gcc-time "132 SBU (including 82 SBU for tests)"> >> + <!ENTITY gcc-md5sum "c9616fd448f980259c31de613e575719"> >> + <!ENTITY gcc-size "92 MB"> >> + <!ENTITY gcc-buildsize "7.2 GB (with tests)"> >> + <!ENTITY gcc-time "45.7 SBU (with tests and parallelism=4)"> >> ]> >> <sect1 id="gcc" xreflabel="GCC-&gcc-version;"> >> @@ -318,16 +318,23 @@ >> names >> </seg> >> <seg> >> - libgfortran.{so,a}, >> - libgo.{so,a}, libgobegin.a, libgolibbegin.a, libnetgo.a, >> - libobjc.{so,a}, and numerous other run-time libraries and >> executables >> + libasan.{so,a}, libatomic.{so,a}, libcc1.so, >> libcilkrts.{so,a}, >> + libgcc_s.so, libgfortran.{so,a}, libgobegin.a, >> libgolibbegin.a, >> + libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so, libgomp.{so,a}, libgo.{so,a}, >> + libitm.{so,a}, liblsan.{so,a}, libnetgo.a, libobjc.{so,a}, >> + libquadmath.{so,a}, libssp_nonshared.a, libssp.{so,a}, >> libstdc++fs.a, >> + libstdc++.{so,a}, libsupc++.a, libtsan.{so,a}, >> libubsan.{so,a}, >> + libvtv.{so,a}, and numerous other run-time libraries and >> executables >> in <filename class="directory">/usr/lib/gcc</filename>, >> <filename class="directory">/usr/libexec/gcc</filename>, and >> <filename class="directory">/usr/lib/go</filename> >> </seg> >> <seg> >> - >> /usr/lib/gcc/<arch-triplet>/&gcc-version;/include/objc and >> - /usr/lib/go >> + /usr/include/c++/&gcc-version;, /usr/lib/bfd-plugins, >> + /usr/libexec/gcc/<arch-triplet>/&gcc-version;, >> + /usr/lib/gcc/<arch-triplet>/&gcc-version;, >> + /usr/lib/go/&gcc-version;, /usr/share/gcc-&gcc-version;, and >> + /usr/share/gdb/auto-load >> </seg> >> </seglistitem> >> </segmentedlist> >> >> > Hi, > > First, I want to apologize for not doing this update myself. Reason is > "not enough time at the moment". I hope to find some time during the > week for gcc-{ada,java} (thanks for splitting the ticket).
I asssumed your lack of time, no problem. > > I have no objection to the above addition of executables and directories > to the list of installed files, but there is a sentence saying "Some > program and library names and descriptions are not listed here, but can > be found at > ../../../../lfs/view/development/chapter06/gcc.html#contents-gcc > <file:///home/lfs/view/development/chapter06/gcc.html#contents-gcc> as > they were initially installed during the building of LFS", at the > beginning of the paragraph. If we definitely decide to add those files > to the "Contents" paragraph, this sentence should be dropped, don't you > think so? Also this would imply to add the corresponding short > descriptions. My sequence is first, find the directories, second, programs, and last, libraries. I had read the sentence, after including the "Installed Programs". Stopped thinking about it, and reverted them. I like the sentence. It facilitates not needing most short descriptions. Then, considered that it was not exactly true for me, because LFS installed version 5.2.0. This made me to keep the directories (notice that now I have them for 5.2.0 and 5.3.0). Another problem is that I use exactly the commands as they are, which install new programs, libraries and directories, such as the ones for fortran. After your post, I am inclined to list all programs, too, but would like to have the sentence modified, not dropped, because I think it is important. So, will include the installed programs list, but would be much grateful if you could help me with a replacement sentence. That is, if you agree with what I wrote above. Thanks again. -- []s, Fernando, aka SÃsifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
