Em 07-12-2015 08:19, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 07-12-2015 05:50, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
>> On 06/12/2015 22:23, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Author: fernando
>>> Date: Sun Dec 6 13:23:03 2015
>>> New Revision: 16712
>>> [...]
>>> Modified: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc.xml
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> names
>>> </seg>
>>> <seg>
>>> - libgfortran.{so,a},
>>> - libgo.{so,a}, libgobegin.a, libgolibbegin.a, libnetgo.a,
>>> - libobjc.{so,a}, and numerous other run-time libraries and
>>> executables
>>> + libasan.{so,a}, libatomic.{so,a}, libcc1.so,
>>> libcilkrts.{so,a},
>>> + libgcc_s.so, libgfortran.{so,a}, libgobegin.a,
>>> libgolibbegin.a,
>>> + libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so, libgomp.{so,a}, libgo.{so,a},
>>> + libitm.{so,a}, liblsan.{so,a}, libnetgo.a, libobjc.{so,a},
>>> + libquadmath.{so,a}, libssp_nonshared.a, libssp.{so,a},
>>> libstdc++fs.a,
>>> + libstdc++.{so,a}, libsupc++.a, libtsan.{so,a},
>>> libubsan.{so,a},
>>> + libvtv.{so,a}, and numerous other run-time libraries and
>>> executables
>>> in <filename class="directory">/usr/lib/gcc</filename>,
>>> <filename class="directory">/usr/libexec/gcc</filename>, and
>>> <filename class="directory">/usr/lib/go</filename>
>>> </seg>
>>> <seg>
>>> -
>> First, I want to apologize for not doing this update myself. Reason is
>> "not enough time at the moment". I hope to find some time during the
>> week for gcc-{ada,java} (thanks for splitting the ticket).
>
> I asssumed your lack of time, no problem.
>
>>
>> I have no objection to the above addition of executables and directories
>> to the list of installed files, but there is a sentence saying "Some
>> program and library names and descriptions are not listed here, but can
>> be found at
>> ../../../../lfs/view/development/chapter06/gcc.html#contents-gcc
>> <file:///home/lfs/view/development/chapter06/gcc.html#contents-gcc> as
>> they were initially installed during the building of LFS", at the
>> beginning of the paragraph. If we definitely decide to add those files
>> to the "Contents" paragraph, this sentence should be dropped, don't you
>> think so? Also this would imply to add the corresponding short
>> descriptions.
>
> My sequence is first, find the directories, second, programs, and last,
> libraries.
>
> I had read the sentence, after including the "Installed Programs".
> Stopped thinking about it, and reverted them. I like the sentence. It
> facilitates not needing most short descriptions.
>
> Then, considered that it was not exactly true for me, because LFS
> installed version 5.2.0. This made me to keep the directories (notice
> that now I have them for 5.2.0 and 5.3.0).
>
>
> After your post, I am inclined to list all programs, too, but would like
> to have the sentence modified, not dropped, because I think it is important.
Second thoughts:
Will revert libraries to what you listed. And try to adapt the sentence
for the new directories only.
--
[]s,
Fernando, aka SÃsifo
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
