Randy McMurchy wrote: > M.Canales.es wrote these words on 05/15/05 17:38 CST: > >>El Lunes, 16 de Mayo de 2005 00:16, Randy McMurchy escribiÃ: >> >> >>>I really think it is wrong to change the capitalization the maintainer >>>provides, simply because it is used in a title. >> >>In some packages documentation the maintainers uses also capitalization when >>the package name is the first word of a title. > > > Agreed, in some. And the opposite is equally true. Take the > desktop-file-utils package for example (which is the one that > caught my eye earlier). > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fdesktop_2dfile_2dutils
What I'm looking for is to be consistent with the package names that the originator uses. If they are using different cases in different situtations, than I think its OK for us to do the same. Otherwise, we should be using the case they use. Does this make sense? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
