Richard A Downing wrote these words on 08/01/05 14:20 CST: > If I understood your plan 'a placeholder in place of the real > instructions' in a branch, then many, probably working, packages will be > ommitted. Of course, a user could just nip over to 6.1, but why make > him bother. Can't we do a blanket 'WARNING not validated for GCC-4 yet - > please report success to ...' insert into all package instructions? > Essentially, I'm saying the placeholder should be the GCC-3 instructions > with a warning.
That would be a lot of hand-editing. However, now that I stop and think for a moment, it could probably be automated. The only reason I was thinking of a placeholder (which the original instructions with a note in them is just that), was so it would be easy to track which packages were confirmed, and which were not. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:33:00 up 121 days, 14:06, 2 users, load average: 0.15, 0.09, 0.31 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
