On 8/1/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tushar Teredesai wrote: > > > Based on my past experience with gcc upgrade, I plan to stay away from > > gcc-4.x till a 4.1 release :-) So a branch sounds good to me. > > Tushar, you're at least the second person I know of that's stated the > same plan. However, 4.1.0 will more than likely be *less stable* than > whatever 4.0.x version is out at the time, due to the way GCC's releases > are managed.
I was more worried about pacakes that won't compile with gcc-4.x or worse will 'mis-compile'. Based on past experience, by the time a .1 release is made, the packages do stabilize. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
