Randy McMurchy wrote: > Richard A Downing wrote these words on 08/17/05 12:33 CST: > > >>Just noticed that in the 3.4.4 patch Jim Gifford says 'Upstream Status: >>Delayed till 3.4.4' ( it IS 3.4.4 !). So I guess it wasn't, and hence >>needs to be the LFS Ch6. My best guess is that it is still needed for >>those apps that needed it before - I'm not qualified to make that >>determination though. > > > If so, this discussion needs to be moved to LFS-Dev. Keep trying with > Jim, see what he says. Thanks for the research OldFellow. :-) >
OK, Jim says it should have gone in to 3.3.6 (bug #16625 and #16276 in gcc bugzilla), but for some unknown reason didn't. So keep the patch. The upstream status should probably be 'Accpeted, but implementation delayed', I guess. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
