Hello, There's a bug out right now because bc -l (with gcc-4 I think) segfaults. The fix is simple and already is in the patches repo. See here:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1846 One thing I want to be considered is using the sed's rather than the patches. There are 3 patches consisting of 4 one line fixes. The same thing can be accomplished with these 4 sed's: sed -i '/PROTO.*readline/d' bc/scan.l sed -i '/flex -I8/s/8//' configure sed -i '/stdlib/a #include <string.h>' lib/number.c sed -i 's/program.*save/static &/' bc/load.c So, I'm wondering what people prefer. 3 patches (which could be consolidated) or the 4 sed's. Also, Randy has asked whether we should be removing the libedit optional dependency since (I think) it overwrites readline's libhistory and libreadline. This has caused a couple very odd support questions. Libedit's most recent release was in 2001-07. I personally feel that warning that it will overwrite readline will be sufficient. -- D\an -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
