M.Canales.es wrote these words on 05/22/06 14:03 CST: > - Mesa is listed also as an dependency for libtiff, but libtiif have also an > optional dependency on X, that already includes Mesa. Isn't that redundant?
I was not a big fan of that being added to LibTIFF, as I felt it 1)confusing and 2)unnecessary. There was already a Glut package listed, that is a small compact perfect-for-the-job library. Now the entire Mesa is listed as an alternative to freeglut. And listed first no less. I'll be the second now to recommend Mesa's removal from the LibTIFF page. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:12:00 up 10 days, 6:12, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.06, 0.01 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
