Hi all, Noted that there is some minor trivial updates to CLFS recently, the occasional package updates to LFS, and updates to jalfs (which is only as good as the [x]LFS books), there really is no development going on at all any more within the LFS project.
Discussion (you know, where people interact and contribute different thoughts and ideas) is almost nil on the lists and commits have come to a slow crawl. For example, there was a post asking about some garbage (my opinion, that is all, and I'm entitled to it) about changing the HLFS to some insect names and there wasn't even *one* post to say yea or nay about the idea. Now there is butterflies (jeez, help me) describing the HLFS project, without even one comment, good or bad. (I think this butterfly, cocoon crap is just horrible [not the concept, but the naming structure]). This only means there is total apathy within the project, and nobody really cares any more. I am really concerned about the health of the entire overall project. Recently there was a call for funds to replace the Belgarath server. Funds were raised in a matter of days. For all practical purposes, anyone who contributed money, wasted it. That call for funds (and the raising of it) was *many* months ago. There has been no effort to even explain where the donated money went (other than someone bought some hardware, and has it, but won't commit the couple of hours it would take to put it online). The entire LFS project seems to be in the toilet. Am I the only one that thinks this? Am I over reacting? Is there anyone else concerned about the health of the project? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 23:40:00 up 9 days, 16:11, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.10, 0.03 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
