Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I'm leaning to 6.2.0.
Seems reasonable to me. Do you want me to update the milestones that
are available?
I'm sorry this response is a bit late. I've been out of town.
[crossposted to lfs-dev, replies should be sent to blfs-dev]
I am out of town right now and will be for a week. As far as
the milestones go, let's go back to the old-fashioned method
of the group giving +1, -1 votes for the desired choice of:
1. Change all the references of BLFS-6.2 to BLFS-6.2.0 and
go forward.
2. Keep what we have (BLFS-6.2), and when the follow-up is
released, call it BLFS-6.2u1 (the 'u' is for 'update', but
could be anything such as 'r' for 'release' or whatever is
best).
Bruce, I can go either way. It doesn't matter, but I now lean
to #2, simply because it is easier.
--
Randy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
