Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/31/07 10:26 CST: > I'd say it's up to you, but if you reduce it to one, you need to > acknowledge those who went before.
I suppose I didn't describe my intentions/thoughts well enough. What I'm asking is if we should continue to describe the previous books. This doesn't have anything to do with the personal commentary from each of the Editors. It is only concerning the individual descriptions of the previous versions. So, to condense: Everything stays the same. Only I'm wondering should we have the two sections: "Preface to version 6.0" and "Preface to Version 6.1" stay in the book? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 10:29:00 up 21 days, 10:43, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
