Justin R. Knierim wrote these words on 01/31/07 21:50 CST: > Yep, I'll do this tonight. I have a few packages to update still which > shouldn't take long, and then since it is a symlink tree just cp -a from > svn to 6.2.0. It should be called 6.2.0 then or 6.2?
Yes, 6.2.0 would be great. We'll use this for all the release candidate versions, then when the final release is done, it simply takes a one-time make-sure that all the packages are there and we're done. Version 6.2.1 will take an entire new directory, as we won't want to disturb the 6.2.0 dir. Hopefully, I'm making sense here. > Either way is > fine, just let me know. I can symlink 6.2.0-rc1 or whatever to 6.2.0 if > it would help with anything as well. So far have gone for just major > and minor. If you want to create symlinks for the rc? versions, then great, however, please do whatever is easiest for you, and still accomplishes the mission. Most of all, thanks for your timely response and willingness to do whatever is necessary. I'm going to try to get the rc1 version out this evening (currently 22:00 hours CST), and point to a 6.2.0 directory for source files on Anduin. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 22:02:00 up 21 days, 22:16, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.07, 0.02 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page