On 24/12/11 11:44, Ken Moffat wrote: > For accepting /usr/libexec - I'm mostly in favour : if upstream > want to use it, that's their decision. I think it probably violates > the fhs, which will be why the book has avoided it. 'Mostly' > because there are occasional packages such as dhcp which use weird > other (not libexec) directory locations - some conformance with > custom and practice is nice. > > For webkit - you're right. I think Wayne has specified everything in > case it is needed. Somethng else to review after merging. > > ĸen
I'm not sure if it was with webkit package, but I think I put it in because it created an empty directory regardless. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
