On 05/02/2012 02:08 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2012 12:47:33 +0100 > "Armin K."<kre...@email.com> wrote: > >> On 05/02/2012 12:58 PM, a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: >>> Author: andy >>> Date: 2012-05-02 04:58:33 -0600 (Wed, 02 May 2012) >>> New Revision: 10058 >>> >>> Modified: >>> trunk/BOOK/x/lib/gtk+3.xml >> >> Next time discuss before reverting my work, ok? >> >> http://www.gtk.org/ >> >> it's GTK+, not Gtk ... And since we have two versions, I put GTK+-3 (It >> could be GTK+ 3 also= ... > > Sorry, I was just trying to make it more consistent across the book. > Links to the Gtk 2 page show as gtk+-2.24.10 and links to Gtk 3 show as > GTK+-3.4.1. It seems inconsistent to have one as ALL CAPITALS and the > other as all lower case. We could make them all capitals if you want, > but when Bruce brought up the subject of links lately > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2012-April/022891.html > I got the impression that we agreed that the title should match the > package file name >
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.4/gtk+-3.4.1.tar.xz It's still gtk+3 not gtk 3 (And I prefer to capitalize everything since upstream called it that way). If you set title to the GTK+, then set everything else. I really don't care for GTK+2 ... You could switch them to the same format if it was necesary, but don't revert other people's work (like you did on the cairo page, even tough comment explained everything). > And for what it's worth, I wrote the Gtk 3 page. It's not "my" work as > it's part of the book. It belongs to all of us. > > Andy "my work" -> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-book/2012-April/031971.html - check gtk3.xml modifications. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
