On 06/11/2012 06:09 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100 > Fernando de Oliveira<fam...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > >> >> Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch. > > Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake). > > Good news everyone, it seems that the patch has been accepted upstream > and will be committed tomorrow so we'll only need to carry the patch > until that change filters out into the releases. > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752895 > > Andy
Hm, maybe this was already mentioned somewhere, but I am curious. Is there any good reason why BLFS instructions use installer method for Mozilla products? What was wrong with make install? IIRC, that was used for quite long time, wasn't it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
