Ken Moffat wrote: > I'm moderately surprised that you seem to be running tests on > everything (I thought you had taken a similar stance to myself and > Andy for *blfs* tests, and I suspect that LFS-7.2 will turn out to > be sufficiently different from current -svn to make any results > meaningless, e.g. because of glibc-2.16), but it's your system and > your CPU cycles :)
I don't really do it for myself. It's more of logging the results so I can help others if the question arises. Actually, the test results give me an idea of the care that upstream programmers put into the program. If all tests pass, then I have a little more confidence. If the package builds with no gcc warnings, I get even more confidence. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
